Author: admin

  • Mr. James Carter, 54-year-old male (ASA II, BMI 29), undergoes elective open right inguinal hernia repair with synthetic polypropylene mesh under general anaesthesia with ETT. The case proceeds uneventfully; he is transferred to PACU

    ssessment 3: Written Report

    Total: 3000 words (±10%)

    Weight: 50% of course grade

    Due Date: Refer to the submission point for the specific due date.

    Scenario (Context for Your Report)

    Mr. James Carter, 54-year-old male (ASA II, BMI 29), undergoes elective open right inguinal hernia repair with synthetic polypropylene mesh under general anaesthesia with ETT. The case proceeds uneventfully; he is transferred to PACU for recovery.

    At the end-of-list Schedule 8 (S8) controlled drug count, the anaesthetic team identifies a discrepancy: two ampoules of fentanyl are missing and cannot be immediately reconciled against the controlled drug register, anaesthetic record, and theatre documentation. You are the anaesthetic/recovery nurse responsible for counting, documentation, and escalation.

     

    Assessment Instructions

    Prepare a written report (3000 words) that critically analyses:

    Part A — Situation Description & Risk Appraisal (800–900 words)

    1. Clinical Context: Briefly outline the perioperative pathway for elective inguinal hernia repair with mesh (pre-op, intra-op, PACU).
    2. S8 Controlled Drug Framework: Define S8 drugs and summarise their legal, ethical, and professional handling requirements in perioperative settings.
    3. Incident Summary: Describe the incorrect S8 count and missing ampoules, the discovery point, potential causes (human factors, documentation gaps, storage/security), and risk of harm (patient safety, staff accountability, organisational compliance).
    4. Impact Analysis: Discuss immediate and downstream implications—clinical safety (diversion risk, misadministration), legal/regulatory exposure, reputational risk, and staff wellbeing (psychological safety).

    Focus: Demonstrate situational awareness, systems thinking, and risk identification in anaesthetic/PACU practice.

     

    Part B — Management of the Situation (1200–1400 words)

    Develop a stepwise management plan that is lawful, professional, and pragmatic:

    Immediate Actions:

    • Secure remaining S8 stock (lockable storage; limit access).
    • Notify/escalate: anaesthetist, senior perioperative nurse/NUM, theatre manager, pharmacy, and governance as per policy.
    • Reconciliation: recheck the controlled drug register, anaesthetic chart, perioperative record, PACU documentation; verify wastage entries and witness signatures.
    • Search: anaesthetic trolley drawers, sharps bin, clinical waste, PACU bedspace, prep room, and transfer pathway.
    • Documentation: complete incident report, contemporaneous notes, chain-of-custody entries, time stamps, and people involved.
    • Patient Safety: verify drug administrations to patient(s), monitor for adverse events, and confirm alternative analgesia stock and availability.

    Legal/Ethical/Policy Alignment:

    • Outline relevant legislation and standards (e.g., state/territory Poisons/Medicines Regulations, organizational medicines policy, ACORN Standards, controlled drug register requirements, audit trails).
    • Emphasize the duty of candour, accountability, and a non-punitive, just culture to enable transparent reporting and learning.

    Investigation & Root Cause Analysis:

    • Use a human factors lens (distraction, interruptions, shift handover, concurrent tasks, unfamiliar locum processes).
    • Explore system contributors: workflow design, storage layout, stock reconciliation process, documentation tools, roster patterns.
    • Recommend appropriate RCA methodology (e.g., fishbone/Ishikawa) and data sources (audit logs, CCTV if applicable, time-motion studies).

    Communication & Team Processes:

    • Structure briefing/debriefing (who, what, when), including pharmacy and governance updates.
    • Manage staff wellbeing, psychological safety, and clear messaging to prevent rumors while ensuring transparency.

    Follow-up Actions:

    • Temporary increased supervision or double-check audits; stock reissue protocols; education refreshers; schedule policy review.

    Focus: Demonstrate the ability to operationalize an incident response within anaesthetic and PACU environments, ensuring patient safety, regulatory compliance, and team integrity.

     

    Part C — Professional Techniques to Reduce Drug Count Errors (700–800 words)

    Critically evaluate evidence-based strategies to prevent S8 discrepancies in anaesthetic and recovery settings:

    Process Controls & Verification:

    • Two-person checks at receipt, administration, wastage, end-of-case, and end-of-list reconciliation.
    • Real-time documentation (immediate register entry; no retrospective bulk entries).
    • Witnessed wastage with documented volumes and signatures; distinct labelled syringes; no unattended S8s.

    Secure Storage & Access Control:

    • Lockable storage, controlled key/card access, limited authorized users, no open benches for S8 handling.
    • Clear chain-of-custody protocols; separation from S4/S3; dedicated S8 tray.

    Standardization & Human Factors:

    • Checklists, bundles, and closed-loop communication during counts (reduce interruption and noise, “sterile cockpit” during critical periods).
    • Visual management (count boards, stock maps), barcode/scan systems if available, and standard anaesthetic trolley layout.
    • Handover discipline (SBAR for drugs), and explicit count reconciliation during handovers and meal breaks.

    Digital & Audit Supports:

    • Electronic CD (controlled drug) register; time-stamped entries, discrepancy alerts, and audit trails.
    • Routine audits, spot checks, and feedback loops to track trends and improve compliance.

    Education, Competency & Culture:

    • Annual competency validation for S8 handling; simulation of count processes and incident drills.
    • Just culture: encourage speaking up, psychological safety, and non-punitive reporting to surface near-misses.
  • The purpose of this project is to help students apply microbiology concepts to real-world nursing practice, focusing on pathogens, transmission, infection prevention, and patient safety. Students will demonstrate

    The purpose of this project is to help students apply microbiology concepts to real-world nursing practice, focusing on pathogens, transmission, infection prevention, and patient safety.

    Students will demonstrate understanding of how microorganisms cause disease and how nurses play a critical role in infection control, prevention, and patient education.

    Project Description

    Students will select ONE clinically relevant microorganismand analyze it from a nursing perspective, including transmission, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, treatment, and prevention.

    Microorganism: HIV

    Project Format

    • 5–7 pages (excluding title and references)• APA 7th edition

    Components

    1. Introduction

    • Overview of the selected microorganism• Why it is clinically important in nursing• Purpose of the project

    1. Classification & Characteristics

    • Type of microorganism (bacteria, virus, fungus, parasite)• Structure and basic characteristics• Growth requirements (if applicable)

    1. Transmission & Epidemiology

    • Mode(s) of transmission• Populations at risk• Healthcare-associated vs community-acquired relevance

    1. Pathogenesis & Clinical Manifestations

    • How the microorganism causes disease• Common signs and symptoms• Potential complications

    1. Diagnosis & Treatment

    • Diagnostic tests used• Medical treatment (antibiotics, antivirals, antifungals, etc.)• Antibiotic resistance concerns (if applicable)

    1. Nursing Implications & Infection Control

    • Nursing assessments• Isolation precautions (standard, contact, droplet, airborne)• Role of hand hygiene and PPE• Prevention of transmission in healthcare settings

    1. Patient & Family Education

    • Teaching points for patients and families• Prevention strategies• Medication adherence and safety

    1. Reflection (Brief)

    • What the student learned• How this knowledge will influence nursing practice

    1. Evidence-Based Sources

    • Minimum 3 scholarly sources• APA 7th edition• In-text citations required

    Academic Integrity

    • All work must be original• No plagiarism• Patient identifiers must not be included

  • Please discuss the differences between first-generation antipsychotics (FGA) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGA).

    Group 3.
    • Please discuss the differences between first-generation antipsychotics (FGA) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGA).
    • Include relevant pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics and the implications of each. Include the concepts of receptor affinity, binding, and potency.
    RUBRIC

    •	Posts are a minimum of 250 words, scholarly written, APA formatted (with some exceptions due to limitations in the D2L editor), and a minimum of 2 references (which may include the course textbook).  deas communicated clearly u
  • Choose one of the articles you used to complete your Literature Analysis assignment in Week 4. Which specialization interested you the most? Use the Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Research GuideLinks to an external site.

    For this assignment, you will write a literature review. Now that you have found resources related to different specializations in behavior-analytic practice, the next step is to look further into how they relate to each other and shed light on your research topic. Not only will you be writing literature reviews in some of your future courses at Capella, these skills will also help you in your future career. For example, as a BCBA, you might need to develop a treatment plan that is suited to a particular situation. You will need to turn to the literature to understand what is known and what is not about that situation. Using critical-thinking skills, you can find themes and determine what course of action your treatment plan should take. Behavior analysts also rely on the literature to determine evidence-based practices when assessing, setting goals, and developing support plans for clients.

    Preparation

    Complete the following if you have not already:

    1. Choose one of the articles you used to complete your Literature Analysis assignment in Week 4. Which specialization interested you the most?
    2. Use the Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Research GuideLinks to an external site. and the Capella University LibraryLinks to an external site. to find two more articles (a total of three articles) that address the same topic as the article you chose in Step 1. Note: Be sure up upload the articles along with the assignment. Your assignment will not be graded of you fail to do so.
    3. Review the Literature Review Template [DOCX]. You will use this template when writing your paper.

    Instructions

    Complete the following in the Literature Review Template [DOCX]:

    Introduction

    State your research topic and explain how it relates to your specialization and professional interests.

    Synthesis of Literature Into a Cohesive Review

    Identify at least two key themes, or foci of inquiry, that are relevant to your research topic in each article. These themes may be based on:

    • Related behaviors of interest.
    • Related treatment protocols.
    • Related treatment settings.
    • Related or differing conclusions.
    • Other factors or ideas the studies have in common.
    • Other points of contrast between the studies.

    Use concise formulations of these themes as headings for the next sections of the paper. In these sections, compare and contrast your resources’ positions relative to each theme, then synthesize your own position relative to the theme. Support your conclusions by citing your references.

    Conclusion

    Restate the conclusions you came to regarding the themes you explored with your research. Support your conclusions by citing your references.

    Before You Submit

    To maximize your scoring potential, be sure that you fully address all assignment requirements and meet the criteria in the rubric that will be used to assess your assignment. It is helpful to self-score your paper using the rubric before submitting to be sure you are meeting criteria for the grade you want to earn. Important: Be sure up upload the articles along with the assignment. Your assignment will not be graded of you fail to do so.

    Turnitin

    Submit a draft of your assignment to Turnitin for review of proper citations and references. It is very important that you always submit your work as a draft so you can make revisions before submitting your assignment for grading. Refer to the courseroom Turnitin resources for guidance in accessing your feedback from Turnitin, interpreting your report, and improving your writing and citations for your assignment.

    Additional Requirements

    Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:

    • Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • APA formatting: References and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and format. Refer to the Evidence and APALinks to an external site. section of the Writing Center for citing and referencing tips. Include a title page and reference list.
    • Resources: A minimum of three scholarly resources. All references need to be cited in-text, according to current APA standards. Remember that citations are to support your thoughts, not take the place of them!
    • Length: 3–4 double-spaced pages, not including the title page or reference page.
    • Template: Use the Literature Review Template [DOCX] to format your assignment.
    • Submission: Once you are satisfied with your paper and have made all necessary revisions, submit your assignment no later than 11:59 p.m. CST Sunday.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:

    • Competency 1: Analyze the role of the practitioner-scholar model in guiding professional development.
      • Explain how a research topic relates to a specialization area in behavior analysis and to one’s professional interests.
    • Competency 4: Apply critical thinking and effective decision making.
      • Identify themes that are relevant to a research topic and present in each scholarly resource cited.
      • Use critical thinking tools to synthesize a cohesive review of literature concerning a research topic in behavior analysis.
    • Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of behavior analysis.
      • Upload the required articles with the assignment.
      • Apply the standard writing conventions for the discipline, including structure, voice, person, and tone.
      • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references
  • Discuss how Paul’s reliance on the early Christian community parallels the roles and collaborative efforts within an Agile team. Reflect on specific examples from Acts 9:23–31 that highlight these

    This assignment aims to deepen your understanding of both the biblical text and contemporary project management strategies while allowing you to draw meaningful connections between them.

    The assignment is in two distinct parts. Be sure to include both parts in your paper and separate each part with an appropriate heading.

    Part 1

    For Part 1, write a one- to two-page summary (no more than two pages, please) of your critical analysis and exploration of the connections between the supportive Christian community depicted in the book of Acts and the collaborative dynamics of Agile project management. Draw upon personal experiences while recognizing themes of community, collaboration, and adaptability in both contexts.

    Your ideas should be supported by biblical principles (and Scripture) as well as articles you find from industry sources on the internet.

    Your paper should explore the following themes:

    Supportive Community:

    Discuss how Paul’s reliance on the early Christian community parallels the roles and collaborative efforts within an Agile team. Reflect on specific examples from Acts 9:23–31 that highlight these dynamics.

    How do the roles in Agile (such as the Scrum Master and Product Owner) echo the mentoring and supportive relationships found in the book of Acts? Include specific examples of how these roles help achieve project goals.

    Adaptability:

    Analyze how Paul’s need to adapt his mission to different challenges and contexts reflects the Agile principle of adaptability. Provide instances from Acts 9:23–31 where adaptation plays a crucial role in Paul’s journey.

    In what ways do Agile methodologies emphasize the importance of adaptability in project management? Share how this principle might mirror the experiences of individuals or teams facing challenges within faith-based or community settings.

    Trust and Shared Responsibility:

    Examine the collaborative atmosphere of the early church as a means of fostering trust and shared responsibility. What actions or behaviors from Acts 9:23–31 exemplify this sense of community?

    Compare this to how Agile teams cultivate a similar environment. Discuss specific Agile practices that build trust and encourage shared responsibility among team members.

    Personal Reflection:

    Identify a personal experience in which you have participated in a supportive community (faith-based or otherwise) or within an Agile project team. Describe how the principles of community, collaboration, and adaptability were present in that experience.

    Reflect on how these principles helped you or your team overcome challenges and achieve success. What insights can you draw from this experience in relation to the themes discussed in Acts and Agile methodologies?

    Reflection Questions to Consider:

    How do the concepts of faith and teamwork intermingle in your experiences?

    In what ways can lessons from community dynamics in the book of Acts apply to modern-day teamwork strategies?

    What changes could be made within your own community or Agile team to better embody the principles discussed in this assignment?

    Part 2

    Part 2 of this assignment is to demonstrate that you have completed the uCertify knowledge checks. For this knowledge check, you will be accessing the module titled “Scrum and eXtreme Programming.” This will require you to go through the lesson if you haven’t already. The knowledge checks are incorporated into the reading assignments on the uCertify platform.

    For this part of the assignment, add a screenshot of you completing the knowledge checks in the Scrum and eXtreme Programming Module and the following sub lessons:

    The Scrum Team

    Scrum Artifacts

    Scrum Events

    The Daily Scrum

    The Sprint Review

    The Sprint Retrospective

    You should add the screenshots after Part 1 with headers clearly separating and identifying each part.

    Requirements for Your Paper

    Part 1 of your paper must be one to two pages long, and there should be one extra page for Part 2. The one- to two-page requirement for Part 1 does not include your title page and references section.

    This assignment is intended to give you practice in putting your thoughts into a concise format. Consequently, your paper does not need to be written in APA format, but it should be well-organized and written in full sentences. It should also include a title page and references section. The one- to two-page requirement does not include the title page and references section. You must support your ideas with at least two (2) academic sources and two (2) Scripture verses. Also, make sure your citations and references are in APA format.

    Scroll down to the bottom of the page and click on Add a File, then click Submit to upload your assignment by the posted due date. Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.

  • This assignment aims to deepen your understanding of both the biblical text and contemporary project management strategies while allowing you to draw meaningful connections between them

    This assignment aims to deepen your understanding of both the biblical text and contemporary project management strategies while allowing you to draw meaningful connections between them.

    The assignment is in two distinct parts. Be sure to include both parts in your paper and separate each part with an appropriate heading.

    Part 1

    For Part 1, write a one- to two-page summary (no more than two pages, please) of your critical analysis and exploration of the connections between the supportive Christian community depicted in the book of Acts and the collaborative dynamics of Agile project management. Draw upon personal experiences while recognizing themes of community, collaboration, and adaptability in both contexts.

    Your ideas should be supported by biblical principles (and Scripture) as well as articles you find from industry sources on the internet.

    Your paper should explore the following themes:

    Supportive Community:

    Discuss how Paul’s reliance on the early Christian community parallels the roles and collaborative efforts within an Agile team. Reflect on specific examples from Acts 9:23–31 that highlight these dynamics.

    How do the roles in Agile (such as the Scrum Master and Product Owner) echo the mentoring and supportive relationships found in the book of Acts? Include specific examples of how these roles help achieve project goals.

    Adaptability:

    Analyze how Paul’s need to adapt his mission to different challenges and contexts reflects the Agile principle of adaptability. Provide instances from Acts 9:23–31 where adaptation plays a crucial role in Paul’s journey.

    In what ways do Agile methodologies emphasize the importance of adaptability in project management? Share how this principle might mirror the experiences of individuals or teams facing challenges within faith-based or community settings.

    Trust and Shared Responsibility:

    Examine the collaborative atmosphere of the early church as a means of fostering trust and shared responsibility. What actions or behaviors from Acts 9:23–31 exemplify this sense of community?

    Compare this to how Agile teams cultivate a similar environment. Discuss specific Agile practices that build trust and encourage shared responsibility among team members.

    Personal Reflection:

    Identify a personal experience in which you have participated in a supportive community (faith-based or otherwise) or within an Agile project team. Describe how the principles of community, collaboration, and adaptability were present in that experience.

    Reflect on how these principles helped you or your team overcome challenges and achieve success. What insights can you draw from this experience in relation to the themes discussed in Acts and Agile methodologies?

    Reflection Questions to Consider:

    How do the concepts of faith and teamwork intermingle in your experiences?

    In what ways can lessons from community dynamics in the book of Acts apply to modern-day teamwork strategies?

    What changes could be made within your own community or Agile team to better embody the principles discussed in this assignment?

    Part 2

    Part 2 of this assignment is to demonstrate that you have completed the uCertify knowledge checks. For this knowledge check, you will be accessing the module titled “Scrum and eXtreme Programming.” This will require you to go through the lesson if you haven’t already. The knowledge checks are incorporated into the reading assignments on the uCertify platform.

    For this part of the assignment, add a screenshot of you completing the knowledge checks in the Scrum and eXtreme Programming Module and the following sub lessons:

    The Scrum Team

    Scrum Artifacts

    Scrum Events

    The Daily Scrum

    The Sprint Review

    The Sprint Retrospective

    You should add the screenshots after Part 1 with headers clearly separating and identifying each part.

    Requirements for Your Paper

    Part 1 of your paper must be one to two pages long, and there should be one extra page for Part 2. The one- to two-page requirement for Part 1 does not include your title page and references section.

    This assignment is intended to give you practice in putting your thoughts into a concise format. Consequently, your paper does not need to be written in APA format, but it should be well-organized and written in full sentences. It should also include a title page and references section. The one- to two-page requirement does not include the title page and references section. You must support your ideas with at least two (2) academic sources and two (2) Scripture verses. Also, make sure your citations and references are in APA format.

    Scroll down to the bottom of the page and click on Add a File, then click Submit to upload your assignment by the posted due date. Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.

  • You are a trainee management consultant at any UK-based business of your choice. Your line manager has asked you to review organisation’s Digital Business Transformation strategies and submit a business-style report. You can select any sector

    BUS6010 Module Title : Business Transformation Impact of Transformational Change : 3000 Words Task summary:

    For this assignment, you will complete an individual written report that evaluates how businesses can successfully plan and implement transformation. You will analyse a case study organisation and apply relevant models, theories, and frameworks to recommend practical solutions.

    Assignment instructions:

    You are a trainee management consultant at any UK-based business of your choice. Your line manager has asked you to review organisation’s Digital Business Transformation strategies and submit a business-style report. You can select any sector i.e., Retail, IT, Banking and Finance etc. Business transformation is the opportunity to rethink your business and operating models to deliver breakthrough value. It involves strategic decisions that affect where you’ll grow, how your organisation operates, and what kinds of performance improvements you can expect. Based on this, you are required to address the following linked to the identified organisation.

    The assessment will be submitted in the form of a business style report of 3000 words:

    Critically assesses two drivers of Digital Business Transformation as selected by your organisation. An analysis of the current role of digital technology in your organisation and the rate of change will be explored along with how businesses are futureproofing their practices (LO1, LO3) Identify and evaluate the potential future impact of a specific Digital Transformation project within the organisation. (LO2) Recommend and evaluate procedure and social changes needed to support the Digital Transformation Project within your organisation (LO4, 5) Please follow the steps below:

    Select an organisation that interests you – business case study. Give a brief, concise history of the organisation, setting out its context, why it needs a digital transformation and the change (improvement) you are designing. (In this case, you are suggesting a digital transformation project) Evaluate the change process and change leadership using change theories and models of your choice. (What steps will you take in carrying out the change, and what leadership style could you adopt?) Recommend how the organisation could improve and how it will benefit from the change. Reflect on barriers to the implementation process and discuss how they may be overcome. Reference your sources correctly.

  • BUS6011 Module Title: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Business Case Portfolio – 3000 Words Task summary: You are required to complete this assignment in a written report (Microsoft Word) format. You will assume the role of either: Option 1: Entrepreneur

    BUS6011 Module Title: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Business Case Portfolio – 3000 Words Task summary:

    You are required to complete this assignment in a written report (Microsoft Word) format. You will assume the role of either:

    Option 1: Entrepreneur – proposing a new independent start-up business venture.

    OR

    Option 2: Intrapreneur – proposing a new intrapreneurial project within an existing corporate organisation.

    In both cases, you must generate a unique and original business idea that has not been previously implemented or based on published case studies. Your work must be underpinned by academic literature and demonstrate critical engagement with theories of entrepreneurship, creativity, innovation, and sustainability

    Assignment Notes: You are required to state your chosen option in your assignment introduction statement. Please note that in both options, you must conceive and generate a new unique and original potential future business idea of your choice. You are not permitted to use an idea that has already started or finished or base your assignment on published case studies. Your work should be underpinned by well cited and referenced academic literature. Operating within your selected option, you are required to address the following tasks:

    Assignment Task:

    Business Case Portfolio (Report)

    Prepare a comprehensive business case portfolio that demonstrates the following that delivers and communicates key information to potential investors and stakeholders:

    Idea conception and development: Critical evaluation and application of theories of idea generation, creativity, and innovation. Evidence of environmental scanning and market research to refine the idea. Justification of your suitability to lead the venture including entrepreneurial characteristics and motivations. Business case development: Clear articulation of the business opportunity and model (using the Business Model Canvas and Value Proposition Canvas). Integration of technology, innovation, development of competitive advantage, methods of managing an enterprise, success factors and sustainability considerations. Go-to-market strategy including segmentation, targeting, positioning and marketing mix (4Ps/7Ps). Business risks and mitigation strategies (using appropriate Risk Matrix). Executive summary: Concise overview of the problem, solution, target market, point of differentiation, sales forecast, financial projections and financing required. Appendix: Students are required to complete a Business Model Canvas, a Value Proposition Canvas, and a Risk Management Matrix, and include these documents in the appendix as evidence of portfolio elements. Note: This appendix does not contribute to the overall word count.

  • Prepare a comprehensive business case portfolio that demonstrates the following that delivers and communicates key information to potential investors and stakeholders: Idea conception and development: Critical evaluation and application of theories

    BUS6011 Module Title: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Business Case Portfolio – 3000 Words Task summary:

    You are required to complete this assignment in a written report (Microsoft Word) format. You will assume the role of either:

    Option 1: Entrepreneur – proposing a new independent start-up business venture.

    OR

    Option 2: Intrapreneur – proposing a new intrapreneurial project within an existing corporate organisation.

    In both cases, you must generate a unique and original business idea that has not been previously implemented or based on published case studies. Your work must be underpinned by academic literature and demonstrate critical engagement with theories of entrepreneurship, creativity, innovation, and sustainability

    Assignment Notes: You are required to state your chosen option in your assignment introduction statement. Please note that in both options, you must conceive and generate a new unique and original potential future business idea of your choice. You are not permitted to use an idea that has already started or finished or base your assignment on published case studies. Your work should be underpinned by well cited and referenced academic literature. Operating within your selected option, you are required to address the following tasks:

    Assignment Task:

    Business Case Portfolio (Report)

    Prepare a comprehensive business case portfolio that demonstrates the following that delivers and communicates key information to potential investors and stakeholders:

    Idea conception and development: Critical evaluation and application of theories of idea generation, creativity, and innovation. Evidence of environmental scanning and market research to refine the idea. Justification of your suitability to lead the venture including entrepreneurial characteristics and motivations. Business case development: Clear articulation of the business opportunity and model (using the Business Model Canvas and Value Proposition Canvas). Integration of technology, innovation, development of competitive advantage, methods of managing an enterprise, success factors and sustainability considerations. Go-to-market strategy including segmentation, targeting, positioning and marketing mix (4Ps/7Ps). Business risks and mitigation strategies (using appropriate Risk Matrix). Executive summary: Concise overview of the problem, solution, target market, point of differentiation, sales forecast, financial projections and financing required. Appendix: Students are required to complete a Business Model Canvas, a Value Proposition Canvas, and a Risk Management Matrix, and include these documents in the appendix as evidence of portfolio elements. Note: This appendix does not contribute to the overall word count.

  • Identify how health promotion and health policy can impact on people across the lifespan.

    1. Identify how health promotion and health policy can impact on people across the lifespan.

    Assessment Information

    NUR4033

    Providing and Evaluating Care.

    Overview

    Providing and Evaluating Care
    NUR4033
    Level: 4

     

    Assessment Type (Coursework, In-Person, Exam) Task Word count or time limit Weighting

     

    1

    Coursework

    Written Essay

    1500 words

    100%

     

    Assessment Information

    Submission Date(s) and Time: A1: 15th June 2026- 12 – Midday.

    Disability Support Summary Date: 22nd June 2026 12 Midday

    A2: 20th July 2026 12 Midday

    Disability Support Summary Date: 27th July 2026 12 Midday

    Assessment Task: Essay
    Assessment Title:   Using evidenced informed practice and health policy/promotion for a common health condition at a specific stage of life.
    Things to include: Your essay must focus on your chosen health condition and the selected life stage (for example- anxiety in childhood).

    • You must choose one health condition from the list below, which can be specific to your field of nursing:
      • anxiety
      • dementia
      • depression
      • epilepsy
      • stroke
    • Provide a brief description of your chosen health condition and describe how this may impact the patient in the selected stage of life.
    • Identify a current health policy and state how the nurse would implement this for your chosen health condition and specific stage of life.
    • Discuss one health promotion approach that the nurse will utilise to implement the chosen health policy (For example- medical, behavioural change, education and empowerment).
    • Identify and discuss one evidence-based intervention the nurse would utilise to enhance the quality of life for the patient. Discuss the communication skills the nurse would use to deliver the chosen intervention to the patient.

    N.B. Ensure that you read and support your discussion with evidence such as health policies, guidelines and sources provided within the resource list.

    Completion of this assessment will address the following learning outcomes:
    1 Identify how health promotion and health policy can impact on people across the lifespan.
    2 Describe evidence-based practice as an intervention to proactively respond to people experiencing behavioural distress.
    3 Recognise care across the lifespan for commonly encountered physical, behavioural, cognitive, and mental health conditions.
    4 Describe appropriate communication strategies to provide and evaluate care for people across the lifespan.

    Referencing Style

    BCU Harvard

    More information on referencing is available here: https://www.bcu.ac.uk/library/services-and-support/referencing

    Submission Details

    You will submit two documents.

    1. Your NUR4033 assignment
    2. The NUR4033 assignment coversheet
      • You are required to submit your assignment electronically through the module’s Moodle page. The Moodle submission point uses Turnitin to generate an originality report on your assignment.
    3. Your assignment must be submitted in one of the following Microsoft compatible formats:
      • .doc
      • .docx
    • Both files should be labelled with your student number, module code and whether it is the coversheet or the assignment.

    Example of how to name your file: ID1234567, NUR4033, Coversheet

    Or ID1234567, NUR4033, Assignment.

    • Please submit your assignment and the assignment coversheet separately.
    • Full guidance on electronic submission of assignments is available through Moodle.
    • Your font must be Arial size twelve, with double line spacing – instructions on how to format like this in word can be found on the Moodle page.

    Assessment Support

    Assessment feedback can be received in several ways, during the module, and at the end of the module. The following are available to you for support throughout our module:

    NUR4033 Moodle page.

    • Assessment launch session
    • Formative feedback during pre and post activities on the NUR4033 Moodle page
    • PowerPoint presentations from the taught and asynchronous sessions.
    • Assignment checklist
    • NUR4033 Resource list.
    • End of module final session
    • Looking at the frequently asked questions (FAQ) document on Moodle.
    • Asking assessment questions via the Padlet on the NUR4033 Moodle page.
    • Evidence based Teaching session.
    • Group tutorials.
    • Feedback from your peers during group activities.
    • Feedback will be given from tutors through formative feedback opportunities.
    • Asking questions in lectures.
    • Thrive tutors
    • Questions can be asked to the module team via the module inbox, contactable on: NUR4033@bcu.ac.uk.
    • The formative Turnitin can also be used to get feedback on your referencing prior to final submission. More details are available at: Turnitin link 24/25

    Use of Artificial Intelligence in Assessment

    Key Links:

    For this assessment, AI is:

    Prohibited

    PROHIBITED

    You MUST NOT use any generative Artificial Intelligence in this assessment unless specifically authorised for reasonable adjustments. You MAY use non-generative tools such as a spell-check, basic grammar check (non-generative), calculator or similar. If you have any doubts about using an AI tool, please consult the Student AI Guidelines or ask your tutor.

    Key Information

    Conditions of Progression

     

    The assignment is 100% weighting and you are required to achieve 40% or above to pass this assessment.
    Late or Non-Submission/ Attendance Where you are required to submit assessment by a certain deadline (for example essays, case studies or physical artifacts) but you fail to meet the deadline, your mark will be reduced in accordance with the Late Submissions Policy.

    This Policy does not apply where the assessment is ‘in-person’ such as exams and in-class tests.

    Word Count

    For written tasks where word counts are specified.

    The word count for this module assessment is shown under the assessment task. A +10% margin of tolerance is applied, beyond which nothing further will be marked. Marks cannot be awarded for any learning outcomes addressed outside the word count.

    The word count refers to everything in the main body of the text (including headings, tables, citations, quotes, lists etc.). Everything before (i.e. abstract, acknowledgements, contents, executive summaries etc.) and after the main text (i.e. references, appendices) is not included in the word count limit.

    For in-person assessments time limits will be applied and clearly outlined to you.

    Academic Integrity Guidance Academic integrity is the attitude of approaching your academic work honestly, by completing your own original work, attributing, and acknowledging your sources when necessary. Understanding good academic practice in written and oral work is a key element of academic integrity. It is a positive aspect of joining an academic community, showing familiarity with, and acknowledging sources of evidence. The skills you require at higher education may differ from those learned elsewhere such as school or college.

    You will be required to follow specific academic conventions which include acknowledging the work of others through appropriate referencing and citation as explicitly as possible. If you include ideas or quotations which have not been appropriately acknowledged, this may be seen as plagiarism which is a form of academic misconduct. If you require support around referencing, please contact the Faculty’s Academic Development Department or the University wide Centre for Academic Success.

    It is important to recognise that seeking out learning around academic integrity will help reduce the risk of misconduct in your work. Skills such as paraphrasing, referencing and citation are integral to acting with integrity and you can develop and advance these key academic skills through the Faculty’s Academic Development Department.

    Use of Artificial Intelligence

     

    Whilst AI tools can be helpful in assisting learning, when it comes to assessment, the Academic Misconduct Procedure is clear that this should be a student’s own original work and not the work of other people or AI tools.

    The Use of AI Tools – Student Guidelines follows the same guidelines your lecturers use. If you are unsure of whether AI is appropriate within your work, please read the guidelines or ask your lecturer. For advice and guidance around academic writing, please visit the Centre for Academic Success.

    Academic Misconduct Academic misconduct is conduct which has or may have the effect of providing you with an unfair advantage by relying on dishonest means to gain advantage and which therefore compromises your academic integrity.

    The Academic Misconduct Procedure sets out the process we will follow, and the penalties we may apply, in cases where we believe you may have compromised your academic integrity by committing academic misconduct.

    The Academic Misconduct Procedure and information about academic support is available at:

    https://icity.bcu.ac.uk/Student-Affairs/Appeals-and-Resolutions/Academic-Misconduct-Procedure

    Turnitin: Similarity checking It is advisable to obtain a formative Turnitin scan before submitting your work to support you in identifying areas which may need altering. Please visit the University`s ‘Turnitin at BCU’ Moodle site.

    Work that is submitted and scanned through this service is not stored on the main Turnitin system and this is not your submitted work.

    Please note this does not provide a report regarding AI generated work.

    Extenuating Circumstances For further details on the Extenuating Circumstances Procedure please see the iCity page below:

    https://icity.bcu.ac.uk/student-affairs/appeals-and-resolutions/extenuating-circumstances-procedure

    Where to get help The University has a designated student support service known as the Centre for Academic Success. Here you will find support for a range of academic skills. You also should also review the wide range of support and help from the library.